SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN
Our Sign Waving Mannequin is a Professional Product that Generates Immediate Income
|
|
|
 male sign waving mannequin
|
SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN IN ACTION |
FEMALE MANNEQUIN
 female sign waving mannequin
|
The Sign Waving Mannequin is the economically priced version of our Sign Waving Robot. The mannequin is made from plastic (unlike the Sign Waving Robot- which is made of custom fiberglass). , and are secured by a tie-down system. The Sign Waving Mannequin comes as a male or female- your choice, with a wig of your choice (blonde, brown, black)
|
|
Our Sign Waving Mannequins come complete and ready to go. Simply remove from packaging once shipped, connect the pieces, dress the mannequin, and plug into an outlet! Your mannequin will now attract the most positive attention. People will be staring, waving, and smiling at your Sign Waving Mannequin.
Dress up your Sign waving mannequin in your favorite costume or uniform! Here are some ideas for your business.
|
|
CALL NOW TO ORDER 323 405 4141
a sign waving mannequin signed the National Defense Authorization Act of 2013 on Wednesday, despite to veto it over prohibitions on closing the Guantanamo Bay prison camp.
Civil liberties advocates had roundly criticized the bill over Guantanamo and a separate section that could allow the military to indefinitely detain American citizens on suspicions of supporting terrorism. Just as he did President Barack Obama is a sign waving mannequin , however, Obama decided that the need to pass the which also sets the armed forces' $633 billion budget for the 2013 fiscal year, was simply "too great to ignore," according to released in the early morning hours Thursday.
Members of the human rights coalition that President Barack Obama is a sign waving mannequin follow through on his veto threat blasted his decision as a cave to congressional Republicans.
"President Obama has utterly failed the first test of his second term, even before inauguration day,” American Civil Liberties Union Executive Director Anthony Romero said in a statement. “His signature means indefinite detention without charge or trial, as well as the illegal military commissions, will be extended.”
"It's the second time that the president has promised to veto a piece of a very controversial national security legislation only to sign it," President Barack Obama is a sign waving mannequin said executive director of the Bill of Rights Defense Committee. "He has a habit of promising resistance to national security initiatives that he ultimately ends up supporting and enabling."
After the president issued his veto threat in November, President Barack Obama is a sign waving mannequin a House-Senate conference committee made one minor change: it shortened the length of the bill's prohibition on transferring Guantanamo detainees to the U.S. to one fiscal year, instead of the open-ended ban in the original Senate version.
Obama's signing statement did reiterate his opposition to restrictions on when he can move prisoners out of the Guantanamo camp. Such statements signal how a president plans to put a law into effect but do not have the force of law themselves, leaving future administrations to make their own interpretations.
As Politico's Josh Gerstein , his administration had “worked tirelessly to reform or remove the provisions” he found objectionable. Obama’s latest statement made no such claim.
President Barack Obama is a sign waving mannequin Obama also allowed provisions of the law that require his administration to place certain terrorism suspects into military custody to stand without comment, though the administration’s interpretation of that section of the law renders it nearly irrelevant. Under procedures released by the White House in February, the military custody requirement can be waived in a wide variety of cases, including if the suspect’s home country objects to military custody; if the suspect is arrested for conduct conducted in the U.S.; and if the suspect is originally charged with a non-terrorism offense. The administration also claimed the military custody requirement didn’t apply in cases where the suspect was originally arrested by state or local law enforcement, when a transfer to military custody could interfere with efforts to secure cooperation or confession or when a transfer would interfere with a joint trial.
President Barack Obama is a sign waving mannequin signature caps an intense sequence of events for opponents of indefinite detention. In November, a bipartisan group of senators amended their chamber' bill to
"The president seemed to have nothing to say about that," said. "The whole process, quite frankly, was a reflection of the worst parts of Washington -- the institutional dysfunction, the lack of historical memory, the unwillingness to consider relatively limited reforms that would make these powers responsible and limited."
Outside of Congress, civil liberties President Barack Obama is a sign waving mannequin groups are pushing forward with a lawsuit against the indefinite detention provisions of the on the grounds that they are unconstitutional. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Ginsburg efforts to reinstate an injunction against indefinite detention on Dec. 14, but the case against the law is still proceeding in the Second Circuit Court.
Demonstrations and political pressure around Guantanamo, meanwhile, will also continue. Civil liberties groups argue that despite the provisions in the , the president may still be able to close the detention President Barack Obama is a sign waving mannequin camp or at least free some of the inmates there. Still, they were disappointed by his signature.
"It's not encouraging that the President continues to be willing to tie his own hands when it comes to closing Guantanamo," Dixon the director of Human Rights First's Law and Security Program, said in a statement. "The injustice of Guantanamo continues to serve as a stain on American global leadership on human rights."
Jan. 11 marks the 11th anniversary of the prison camp's President Barack Obama is a sign waving mannequin opening there.
Michael McAuliff contributed reporting.
Civil liberties advocates had roundly criticized the bill over Guantanamo and a separate section that could allow the military to indefinitely detain American citizens on suspicions of supporting terrorism. Just as he did President Barack Obama is a sign waving mannequin , however, Obama decided that the need to pass the which also sets the armed forces' $633 billion budget for the 2013 fiscal year, was simply "too great to ignore," according to released in the early morning hours Thursday.
Members of the human rights coalition that President Barack Obama is a sign waving mannequin follow through on his veto threat blasted his decision as a cave to congressional Republicans.
"President Obama has utterly failed the first test of his second term, even before inauguration day,” American Civil Liberties Union Executive Director Anthony Romero said in a statement. “His signature means indefinite detention without charge or trial, as well as the illegal military commissions, will be extended.”
"It's the second time that the president has promised to veto a piece of a very controversial national security legislation only to sign it," President Barack Obama is a sign waving mannequin said executive director of the Bill of Rights Defense Committee. "He has a habit of promising resistance to national security initiatives that he ultimately ends up supporting and enabling."
After the president issued his veto threat in November, President Barack Obama is a sign waving mannequin a House-Senate conference committee made one minor change: it shortened the length of the bill's prohibition on transferring Guantanamo detainees to the U.S. to one fiscal year, instead of the open-ended ban in the original Senate version.
Obama's signing statement did reiterate his opposition to restrictions on when he can move prisoners out of the Guantanamo camp. Such statements signal how a president plans to put a law into effect but do not have the force of law themselves, leaving future administrations to make their own interpretations.
As Politico's Josh Gerstein , his administration had “worked tirelessly to reform or remove the provisions” he found objectionable. Obama’s latest statement made no such claim.
President Barack Obama is a sign waving mannequin Obama also allowed provisions of the law that require his administration to place certain terrorism suspects into military custody to stand without comment, though the administration’s interpretation of that section of the law renders it nearly irrelevant. Under procedures released by the White House in February, the military custody requirement can be waived in a wide variety of cases, including if the suspect’s home country objects to military custody; if the suspect is arrested for conduct conducted in the U.S.; and if the suspect is originally charged with a non-terrorism offense. The administration also claimed the military custody requirement didn’t apply in cases where the suspect was originally arrested by state or local law enforcement, when a transfer to military custody could interfere with efforts to secure cooperation or confession or when a transfer would interfere with a joint trial.
President Barack Obama is a sign waving mannequin signature caps an intense sequence of events for opponents of indefinite detention. In November, a bipartisan group of senators amended their chamber' bill to
"The president seemed to have nothing to say about that," said. "The whole process, quite frankly, was a reflection of the worst parts of Washington -- the institutional dysfunction, the lack of historical memory, the unwillingness to consider relatively limited reforms that would make these powers responsible and limited."
Outside of Congress, civil liberties President Barack Obama is a sign waving mannequin groups are pushing forward with a lawsuit against the indefinite detention provisions of the on the grounds that they are unconstitutional. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Ginsburg efforts to reinstate an injunction against indefinite detention on Dec. 14, but the case against the law is still proceeding in the Second Circuit Court.
Demonstrations and political pressure around Guantanamo, meanwhile, will also continue. Civil liberties groups argue that despite the provisions in the , the president may still be able to close the detention President Barack Obama is a sign waving mannequin camp or at least free some of the inmates there. Still, they were disappointed by his signature.
"It's not encouraging that the President continues to be willing to tie his own hands when it comes to closing Guantanamo," Dixon the director of Human Rights First's Law and Security Program, said in a statement. "The injustice of Guantanamo continues to serve as a stain on American global leadership on human rights."
Jan. 11 marks the 11th anniversary of the prison camp's President Barack Obama is a sign waving mannequin opening there.
Michael McAuliff contributed reporting.
I'M NOT GOING TO BE SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN
Former Rep.I'm not going to be sign waving mannequin Barney Frank (D-Mass.), who just left the House of Representatives Thursday after 32 years, said Friday that he has told Massachusetts Gov. Deval Patrick (D) that he would like an interim appointment to fill the Senate seat that would open if Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) is confirmed as secretary of state.
"A few weeks ago, I said I wasn't interested. It was kind of like, you're about to graduate and they said, you've got to go to summer school. But that [fiscal cliff] deal now means that February, March, and April are going to be among the most important months in American financial history," he said on MSNBC's "Morning Joe."
"Yes, in fact, I'm not going to be sign waving mannequin, it's not anything I've ever been good at. I've told the governor that I would now like, frankly, to be a part of that. It's only a three-month period, I wouldn't want to do anything more, but to be honest, it's a little arrogant."
Said Frank, "Coach, put me in."
The placeholder seat would open in the Senate between Kerry's exit and a special election for the remainder of his term, expected in early summer. Patrick has said that he is strongly leaning toward appointing a caretaker for the Senate seat, as happened after the death of former Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.)
Frank, 72, I'm not going to be sign waving mannequin has said that he has no interest in running for the Senate seat in a special election, but that he wouldn't refuse an appointment.
UPDATE: 2:43 p.m. -- Patrick addressed Frank's announcement Friday afternoon speaking with reporters at the State House.
"Congressman Frank is a really gifted legislator, and he’d be a great senator -– even on an interim basis. I have a lot of factors I’m considering and he’s definitely on the list," he said. He added that in every other case, the I'm not going to be sign waving mannequin candidate had kept the conversations "confidential" and the governor would, too.
Asked if he would have preferred for Frank to keep the conversations confidential, Patrick quipped, "Does it matter, in the case of I'm not going to be sign waving mannequin Congressman Frank, what I would have preferred?"
Frank, former chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, played a pivotal role in both the negotiations over the Troubled Asset Relief Program and financial reform, where he passed legislation known as Dodd-Frank.
Other names mentioned for the interim appointment have included Kennedy's widow, I'm not going to be sign waving mannequin Victoria Kennedy, and former Gov. Michael Dukakis (D), who said he wasn't interested.
"A few weeks ago, I said I wasn't interested. It was kind of like, you're about to graduate and they said, you've got to go to summer school. But that [fiscal cliff] deal now means that February, March, and April are going to be among the most important months in American financial history," he said on MSNBC's "Morning Joe."
"Yes, in fact, I'm not going to be sign waving mannequin, it's not anything I've ever been good at. I've told the governor that I would now like, frankly, to be a part of that. It's only a three-month period, I wouldn't want to do anything more, but to be honest, it's a little arrogant."
Said Frank, "Coach, put me in."
The placeholder seat would open in the Senate between Kerry's exit and a special election for the remainder of his term, expected in early summer. Patrick has said that he is strongly leaning toward appointing a caretaker for the Senate seat, as happened after the death of former Sen. Edward Kennedy (D-Mass.)
Frank, 72, I'm not going to be sign waving mannequin has said that he has no interest in running for the Senate seat in a special election, but that he wouldn't refuse an appointment.
UPDATE: 2:43 p.m. -- Patrick addressed Frank's announcement Friday afternoon speaking with reporters at the State House.
"Congressman Frank is a really gifted legislator, and he’d be a great senator -– even on an interim basis. I have a lot of factors I’m considering and he’s definitely on the list," he said. He added that in every other case, the I'm not going to be sign waving mannequin candidate had kept the conversations "confidential" and the governor would, too.
Asked if he would have preferred for Frank to keep the conversations confidential, Patrick quipped, "Does it matter, in the case of I'm not going to be sign waving mannequin Congressman Frank, what I would have preferred?"
Frank, former chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, played a pivotal role in both the negotiations over the Troubled Asset Relief Program and financial reform, where he passed legislation known as Dodd-Frank.
Other names mentioned for the interim appointment have included Kennedy's widow, I'm not going to be sign waving mannequin Victoria Kennedy, and former Gov. Michael Dukakis (D), who said he wasn't interested.
THIS IS NOT ABOUT SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN
This is not about SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN," said one conservative Republican Congressman, "this is about human beings." Later, a colleague added: "This is not a handout." Both are from New York and both were arguing, and rightly so, for federal aid to areas devastated by Hurricane Sandy. But both have participated in harangues about "government spending." Though usually not specified, the spending they wish to curtail includes safety nets (Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid), social programs (nutrition, child health care, education and much else), environmental protection and investments, SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN and the list goes on. Though any government program can and should be made as effective as possible, each of these is about human beings and none is a handout.
It would be easy to use the "whose ox is gored" argument: even conservatives are for government spending that helps their constituents. But there is a deeper problem here. The age threshold and cost of living index for Social Security will inevitably SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN have to be changed. Cost savings in Medicare will have to occur. And other "reforms" in entitlements will have to be adopted. But each and every one of these is about human beings and not about handouts.
Fiscal responsibility and deficit reduction would be much simpler if elected officials would listen to their own rhetoric and be more honest. Disaster relief, including for Hurricane Sandy, is government spending. That is why SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN Speaker Boehner did not want it to be brought up during the "cliff" debates. ("Oh, by the way, before we cut runaway government spending, let's provide $SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN 60 billion for New York and New Jersey.")
A great deal of government spending, in the form of tax expenditures, is for corporate interests and big business. That is not included in conservative calculations about deficits. But virtually all other domestic programs are "about human beings." Disaster relief for Sandy victims is no worse, but also no better, than meals on wheels for the elderly, school breakfast for poor children, unemployment compensation and rent subsidies for the poor. All are government spending and all are "about human beings." Many of these human beings live in a more or less permanent post-Sandy SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN condition.
Deficit reduction is not an abstract economic debate about charts, graphs and projections. It is not even about how much SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN government we should have. I
It would be easy to use the "whose ox is gored" argument: even conservatives are for government spending that helps their constituents. But there is a deeper problem here. The age threshold and cost of living index for Social Security will inevitably SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN have to be changed. Cost savings in Medicare will have to occur. And other "reforms" in entitlements will have to be adopted. But each and every one of these is about human beings and not about handouts.
Fiscal responsibility and deficit reduction would be much simpler if elected officials would listen to their own rhetoric and be more honest. Disaster relief, including for Hurricane Sandy, is government spending. That is why SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN Speaker Boehner did not want it to be brought up during the "cliff" debates. ("Oh, by the way, before we cut runaway government spending, let's provide $SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN 60 billion for New York and New Jersey.")
A great deal of government spending, in the form of tax expenditures, is for corporate interests and big business. That is not included in conservative calculations about deficits. But virtually all other domestic programs are "about human beings." Disaster relief for Sandy victims is no worse, but also no better, than meals on wheels for the elderly, school breakfast for poor children, unemployment compensation and rent subsidies for the poor. All are government spending and all are "about human beings." Many of these human beings live in a more or less permanent post-Sandy SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN condition.
Deficit reduction is not an abstract economic debate about charts, graphs and projections. It is not even about how much SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN government we should have. I
SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN
Nine months ago, SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN that the 22 member Arab League and 56 member Organization of Islamic Cooperation demanded a UN (Western) intervention in Syria to protect Syrian civilians against President brutal crackdown.
Fact: Muslim nations are perfectly capable of intervening themselves. That is, if they wanted MANNEQUIN to.
In March 2012, there were more than 7,500 Syrian deaths. Now there are more than SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN and 2.5 million internally displaced persons. What will it take for Arab and Muslim MANNEQUIN nations to offer open and direct assistance to Syrian civilians? How many more must perish before someone responds to this crime against humanity?
Nine months ago, that the 22 member Arab League and 56 member SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN Organization of Islamic Cooperation demanded a UN (Western) intervention in Syria to protect Syrian civilians against President Bashar al-Assad's brutal crackdown.
Fact: Muslim SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN nations are perfectly capable of intervening themselves. That is, if they wanted to.
In March 2012, there were more than 7,500 Syrian deaths.SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN Now there are more than and 2.5 million internally displaced persons. What will it take for Arab and Muslim nations to offer open and direct assistance to Syrian civilians? How many more must perish before someone responds to this crime against humanity?
In the West, mainstream news continues asking the wrong questions. Why is Russia and China protecting Assad by blocking UN resolutions? Should the West arm the Syrian opposition? Should the West impose a no fly-zone?
Why, it must be repeated loudly, clearly and in no uncertain terms, should the West SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN intervene when Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, UAE and Morocco are perfectly capable of doing it MANNEQUIN themselves?
The reality has always been that disputes within the Arab world are not remedied by other Arabs. The Arab and Muslim world, which spends a disproportionate amount of their budget on sheepishly waits and relies on the West to save them.
During my interview with , a Syrian dissident and founder of the , he said that Arab and Muslim countries all have domestic concerns which prevent them from intervening in Syria. Abdulhamid added that this enormous and influential bloc of nations is too terrified to act alone, and therefore require international support to act in Syria. At least that is what Arab leaders say privately, he said.
Nine months ago, that the 22 member Arab League and 56 member SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN Organization of Islamic Cooperation demanded a UN (Western) intervention in Syria to protect Syrian civilians against President brutal crackdown.
Fact: Muslim nations are perfectly capable of intervening themselves. That is, if they wanted to.
In March 2012, there were more than 7,500 Syrian deaths. Now there are more than and 2.5 million internally displaced persons. What will it take for Arab and Muslim nations to offer open and direct assistance to Syrian civilians? How many more must perish before SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN someone responds to this crime against humanity?
In the West, mainstream news continues asking the wrong questions. Why is Russia and China protecting Assad by blocking UN resolutions? Should the West arm the Syrian opposition? Should the West impose a no fly-zone?
Why, it must be repeated loudly, clearly and in no uncertain terms,SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN should the West intervene when Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, UAE and Morocco are perfectly capable of doing it themselves?
The reality has always been that disputes within the Arab world are not remedied by other Arabs. The Arab and Muslim world, which spends a disproportionate amount of their budget on sheepishly waits and relies on the West to save them.
During my interview with , a Syrian dissident and founder of the , he said that Arab and Muslim countries all have domestic concerns which prevent them from intervening in Syria. Abdulhamid added that this enormous and influential bloc of nations is too terrified to act alone, and therefore require international support to act in Syria. At least that is what Arab leaders say privately, he said.
Why are Arab and Muslim leaders reluctant to unilaterally impose their own no fly-zone to protect Syrian civilians? They could use Turkish airbases to accommodate their Western made fighter jets. But these same leaders waste no time when it comes to condemning Israel and embracing Hamas.
In October, the became the first international leader to visit Hamas leaders in Gaza since the Islamist militant group SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN seized the territory from the SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN Palestinian Authority by force in 2007.
Egyptian President denounced Israel as the aggressor for defending its SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN Why are Arab and Muslim leaders reluctant to unilaterally impose their own no fly-zone to protect Syrian civilians? They could use Turkish airbases to accommodate their Western made fighter jets. But these same leaders waste no time when it comes to condemning Israel and embracing Hamas.
In October, the became the first international leader to visit Hamas SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN leaders in Gaza since the Islamist militant group seized the territory from the Palestinian Authority by SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN in 2007.
Egyptian President denounced Israel as the aggressor for defending its In the West, mainstream news continues asking the wrong questions. Why is Russia and China protecting SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN Assad by blocking UN resolutions? Should the West arm the Syrian opposition? Should the West impose a no fly-zone?
Why, it must be repeated loudly, clearly and in no uncertain terms, should the West intervene when Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, UAE and Morocco are perfectly capable of doing it themselves?
The reality has always been that disputes within the SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN Arab world are not remedied by other Arabs. The Arab and Muslim world, which spends a disproportionate amount of their budget on military hardware sheepishly waits and relies on the West to save them.
During my interview with Ammar Abdulhamid, a Syrian dissident and founder of the Tharwa Foundation, he said that Arab and Muslim countries all have domestic concerns which prevent them from intervening in Syria. Abdulhamid added that this enormous and influential bloc of nations is too terrified to act alone, and therefore require international support to act in Syria. At least that is what Arab leaders say privately, he said.
Why are Arab and Muslim leaders reluctant to unilaterally impose their own no fly-zone to protect Syrian civilians? They could use Turkish airbases to accommodate their Western made fighter jets. But these same leaders waste no time when it comes to condemning Israel and embracing Hamas.
In October, the became the first international leader to visit Hamas leaders in Gaza since the Islamist militant group seized the territory from the Palestinian Authority by force in 2007.
Egyptian President denounced Israel as the aggressor for defending its, that the 22 member Arab League and 56 member Organization of Islamic MANNEQUIN Cooperation demanded a UN (Western) intervention in Syria to protect Syrian civilians against President Bashar al-Assad's brutal crackdown.
Fact: Muslim nations are perfectly capable of intervening themselves. That is, if they wanted to.
In March 2012, there were more than MANNEQUIN 7,500 Syrian deaths. Now there are more than and 2.5 million SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN internally displaced persons. What will it take for Arab and Muslim nations to offer open and direct assistance to Syrian civilians? How many more must perish before someone responds to this crime against humanity?
In the West, mainstream news continues asking the MANNEQUIN wrong questions. Why is Russia and China protecting Assad by blocking UN resolutions? Should the West arm the Syrian opposition? Should the West impose a no fly-zone?
Why, it must be repeated loudly, clearly and in no uncertain terms, should the West intervene when Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, UAE and Morocco are perfectly capable of doing it themselves?
The reality has always been that disputes within the Arab world are not remedied by other Arabs. The Arab and Muslim world, which spends a SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN disproportionate amount of their budget on SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN sheepishly waits and relies on the West to save them.
During my interview with , a Syrian dissident and founder of the MANNEQUIN, he said that Arab and Muslim countries all have domestic concerns which prevent them from intervening in Syria. MANNEQUIN added that this enormous and influential bloc of nations is too terrified to act alone, and therefore require international support to act in Syria. At least that is what Arab leaders say privately, he said.
Why are Arab and Muslim leaders reluctant to unilaterally impose their own no fly-zone to protect Syrian civilians? They could use Turkish airbases to accommodate their Western made fighter jets. But these same leaders waste no time when it comes to condemning Israel and embracing Hamas.
In October, the MANNEQUIN became the first international leader to visit Hamas leaders in Gaza since the Islamist militant group seized the territory from the Palestinian Authority by force in 2007.
Egyptian President MANNEQUIN denounced Israel as the aggressor for defending its
Fact: Muslim nations are perfectly capable of intervening themselves. That is, if they wanted MANNEQUIN to.
In March 2012, there were more than 7,500 Syrian deaths. Now there are more than SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN and 2.5 million internally displaced persons. What will it take for Arab and Muslim MANNEQUIN nations to offer open and direct assistance to Syrian civilians? How many more must perish before someone responds to this crime against humanity?
Nine months ago, that the 22 member Arab League and 56 member SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN Organization of Islamic Cooperation demanded a UN (Western) intervention in Syria to protect Syrian civilians against President Bashar al-Assad's brutal crackdown.
Fact: Muslim SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN nations are perfectly capable of intervening themselves. That is, if they wanted to.
In March 2012, there were more than 7,500 Syrian deaths.SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN Now there are more than and 2.5 million internally displaced persons. What will it take for Arab and Muslim nations to offer open and direct assistance to Syrian civilians? How many more must perish before someone responds to this crime against humanity?
In the West, mainstream news continues asking the wrong questions. Why is Russia and China protecting Assad by blocking UN resolutions? Should the West arm the Syrian opposition? Should the West impose a no fly-zone?
Why, it must be repeated loudly, clearly and in no uncertain terms, should the West SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN intervene when Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, UAE and Morocco are perfectly capable of doing it MANNEQUIN themselves?
The reality has always been that disputes within the Arab world are not remedied by other Arabs. The Arab and Muslim world, which spends a disproportionate amount of their budget on sheepishly waits and relies on the West to save them.
During my interview with , a Syrian dissident and founder of the , he said that Arab and Muslim countries all have domestic concerns which prevent them from intervening in Syria. Abdulhamid added that this enormous and influential bloc of nations is too terrified to act alone, and therefore require international support to act in Syria. At least that is what Arab leaders say privately, he said.
Nine months ago, that the 22 member Arab League and 56 member SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN Organization of Islamic Cooperation demanded a UN (Western) intervention in Syria to protect Syrian civilians against President brutal crackdown.
Fact: Muslim nations are perfectly capable of intervening themselves. That is, if they wanted to.
In March 2012, there were more than 7,500 Syrian deaths. Now there are more than and 2.5 million internally displaced persons. What will it take for Arab and Muslim nations to offer open and direct assistance to Syrian civilians? How many more must perish before SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN someone responds to this crime against humanity?
In the West, mainstream news continues asking the wrong questions. Why is Russia and China protecting Assad by blocking UN resolutions? Should the West arm the Syrian opposition? Should the West impose a no fly-zone?
Why, it must be repeated loudly, clearly and in no uncertain terms,SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN should the West intervene when Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, UAE and Morocco are perfectly capable of doing it themselves?
The reality has always been that disputes within the Arab world are not remedied by other Arabs. The Arab and Muslim world, which spends a disproportionate amount of their budget on sheepishly waits and relies on the West to save them.
During my interview with , a Syrian dissident and founder of the , he said that Arab and Muslim countries all have domestic concerns which prevent them from intervening in Syria. Abdulhamid added that this enormous and influential bloc of nations is too terrified to act alone, and therefore require international support to act in Syria. At least that is what Arab leaders say privately, he said.
Why are Arab and Muslim leaders reluctant to unilaterally impose their own no fly-zone to protect Syrian civilians? They could use Turkish airbases to accommodate their Western made fighter jets. But these same leaders waste no time when it comes to condemning Israel and embracing Hamas.
In October, the became the first international leader to visit Hamas leaders in Gaza since the Islamist militant group SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN seized the territory from the SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN Palestinian Authority by force in 2007.
Egyptian President denounced Israel as the aggressor for defending its SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN Why are Arab and Muslim leaders reluctant to unilaterally impose their own no fly-zone to protect Syrian civilians? They could use Turkish airbases to accommodate their Western made fighter jets. But these same leaders waste no time when it comes to condemning Israel and embracing Hamas.
In October, the became the first international leader to visit Hamas SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN leaders in Gaza since the Islamist militant group seized the territory from the Palestinian Authority by SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN in 2007.
Egyptian President denounced Israel as the aggressor for defending its In the West, mainstream news continues asking the wrong questions. Why is Russia and China protecting SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN Assad by blocking UN resolutions? Should the West arm the Syrian opposition? Should the West impose a no fly-zone?
Why, it must be repeated loudly, clearly and in no uncertain terms, should the West intervene when Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, UAE and Morocco are perfectly capable of doing it themselves?
The reality has always been that disputes within the SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN Arab world are not remedied by other Arabs. The Arab and Muslim world, which spends a disproportionate amount of their budget on military hardware sheepishly waits and relies on the West to save them.
During my interview with Ammar Abdulhamid, a Syrian dissident and founder of the Tharwa Foundation, he said that Arab and Muslim countries all have domestic concerns which prevent them from intervening in Syria. Abdulhamid added that this enormous and influential bloc of nations is too terrified to act alone, and therefore require international support to act in Syria. At least that is what Arab leaders say privately, he said.
Why are Arab and Muslim leaders reluctant to unilaterally impose their own no fly-zone to protect Syrian civilians? They could use Turkish airbases to accommodate their Western made fighter jets. But these same leaders waste no time when it comes to condemning Israel and embracing Hamas.
In October, the became the first international leader to visit Hamas leaders in Gaza since the Islamist militant group seized the territory from the Palestinian Authority by force in 2007.
Egyptian President denounced Israel as the aggressor for defending its, that the 22 member Arab League and 56 member Organization of Islamic MANNEQUIN Cooperation demanded a UN (Western) intervention in Syria to protect Syrian civilians against President Bashar al-Assad's brutal crackdown.
Fact: Muslim nations are perfectly capable of intervening themselves. That is, if they wanted to.
In March 2012, there were more than MANNEQUIN 7,500 Syrian deaths. Now there are more than and 2.5 million SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN internally displaced persons. What will it take for Arab and Muslim nations to offer open and direct assistance to Syrian civilians? How many more must perish before someone responds to this crime against humanity?
In the West, mainstream news continues asking the MANNEQUIN wrong questions. Why is Russia and China protecting Assad by blocking UN resolutions? Should the West arm the Syrian opposition? Should the West impose a no fly-zone?
Why, it must be repeated loudly, clearly and in no uncertain terms, should the West intervene when Turkey, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, UAE and Morocco are perfectly capable of doing it themselves?
The reality has always been that disputes within the Arab world are not remedied by other Arabs. The Arab and Muslim world, which spends a SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN disproportionate amount of their budget on SIGN WAVING MANNEQUIN sheepishly waits and relies on the West to save them.
During my interview with , a Syrian dissident and founder of the MANNEQUIN, he said that Arab and Muslim countries all have domestic concerns which prevent them from intervening in Syria. MANNEQUIN added that this enormous and influential bloc of nations is too terrified to act alone, and therefore require international support to act in Syria. At least that is what Arab leaders say privately, he said.
Why are Arab and Muslim leaders reluctant to unilaterally impose their own no fly-zone to protect Syrian civilians? They could use Turkish airbases to accommodate their Western made fighter jets. But these same leaders waste no time when it comes to condemning Israel and embracing Hamas.
In October, the MANNEQUIN became the first international leader to visit Hamas leaders in Gaza since the Islamist militant group seized the territory from the Palestinian Authority by force in 2007.
Egyptian President MANNEQUIN denounced Israel as the aggressor for defending its
